Auckland’s status as New Zealand's economic powerhouse is under threat, with the region now recording the country's highest unemployment rate and stagnating house prices. According to analysis by economist Cameron Bagrie, the city that accounts for nearly 40 per cent of the nation’s GDP has lost its economic edge and is being outpaced by rural and income-generating regions in the post-pandemic recovery.

For decades, Auckland’s growth was synonymous with New Zealand’s, fuelled by a booming housing market and high levels of migration. This 'broken economic model', as Bagrie describes it, relied on selling increasingly expensive houses to each other and using the resulting wealth effect to drive spending. But with house price growth grinding to a halt, the cracks in the foundation are showing.

Data shows that while Auckland’s economy has grown 288 per cent between 2000 and 2024, its growth in GDP per person has actually lagged behind the national average, at 160 per cent compared to New Zealand's 166 per cent. This underperformance for a city that should be benefiting from the economic advantages of scale, known as agglomeration economics, points to deep-seated issues.

Slipping down the global ladder

The city's struggles are reflected in international benchmarks. The 2025 Oxford Global Cities Index ranked Auckland a lacklustre 85th, trailing Wellington, which placed 78th. For comparison, three Australian cities made the top 20, with Brisbane at 23rd. The report exposes Auckland’s key weaknesses, ranking it 154th for 'Economics' and a dismal 239th for 'Quality of Life'.

These low scores cover factors like economic stability, income per person, housing affordability, and crime. A significant contributor to the poor quality of life is traffic congestion, with Auckland commuters now losing an average of 66 hours per year stuck in traffic. In a city historically shaped by low-density suburban sprawl, this dependence on private vehicles has led to infrastructure failing to keep pace with growth, effectively choking the city.

The historical development of Auckland, characterised by outward growth rather than upward density, laid the groundwork for today's transport woes. While the City Rail Loop promises to improve accessibility to the CBD, Bagrie notes that the city still lacks the broader rapid transit system needed to truly overcome these challenges.

'Get the foundation right'

Despite calls for a 'grand vision' to emulate cities like Singapore or Oslo, Bagrie argues such ambitions are premature. He contends that New Zealand, with limited government funds and a poor track record on project execution, must first fix its fundamental problems. "In rugby parlance, it would be setting a game plan to score lots of tries but without a tight five to deliver the ball," he writes.

Modern Auckland office with blurred figures, symbolizing a struggling economy and slipping global rankings.
Auckland's economic downturn is highlighted by a productivity crisis, impacting its business landscape.

The nation's infrastructure spending highlights this issue. Despite being one of the top-spending countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) at 5.8 per cent of GDP annually, New Zealand ranks near the bottom for capital productivity. Bagrie suggests this points to a need for more efficient management and greater independence for council and government assets before embarking on transformative, and costly, new projects.

The ongoing saga of Auckland’s stadiums is cited as a case in point. Despite a Request for Proposal noting the city could not afford its current mix of four stadiums, no changes have been made, illustrating a lack of decisive action on key infrastructure assets.

Productivity problem stifles incomes

At the heart of Auckland’s and New Zealand's economic malaise is a collapse in productivity. Once averaging 1.4 per cent growth per year, the national decade average has plummeted to just 0.3 per cent. Bagrie states this directly translates into an 'income problem', which in turn magnifies the cost-of-living pressures felt by households across the city. Stagnant productivity means wages do not keep pace with rising costs, from a mortgage on an Auckland apartment to the price of groceries.

However, there is a glimmer of hope. The Auckland city centre itself has bucked the national trend, with labour productivity growth averaging 1.6 per cent over the last 20 years, double that of the rest of New Zealand. This 'productivity premium' demonstrates that agglomeration economics can work when there is sufficient density of capital, companies, and workers. The challenge is extending that success beyond the CBD.

Bagrie argues the enablers for this are not 'sexy or grand'. Instead, they involve a renewed focus on competition policy, innovation, embracing AI and digitisation, improving education outcomes, and cutting red tape to allow for necessary housing intensification.

A call for political stability

Ultimately, Bagrie suggests a path forward for Auckland and New Zealand that is less about specific projects and more about the political environment. He argues that creating long-term policy stability is crucial for making the sustained, difficult decisions needed to address the country's core challenges.

We reside in a fractured world that is becoming increasingly divided with dissatisfied populations, populism on the rise and security a key theme.
— Cameron Bagrie, Bagrie Economics principal economist

He proposes that the greatest advantage New Zealand could cultivate is a return to the political centre, bucking the global trend towards extremism. Such a move, he believes, would create an attractive environment for talent and capital, providing the stability needed to get the economic foundations right.

"Imagine the allure of a country or city that is devoid of the extremism percolating against the current global backdrop? You would fill your boots with talent and capital," Bagrie says. His hope for the year is that New Zealand moves in this direction, arguing that no grand vision for Auckland can work without the income and productivity story to back it up.